*Notices Yuletide*

[coalcube]

OwO What's This?

Monday 15 to Friday 26 September: Nominations (end 9pm UTC 26 September) | Evidence Post | RPF Coordination | Promo Post
Tuesday 14 to Friday 24 October: Sign-ups (end 9pm UTC 24 October)
Sunday 26 October: Assignments out (may be earlier)
Wednesday 10 December: Default deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 17 December: Assignment deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 24 December: Main collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 25 December: Madness collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 1 January: Author reveals, end of event (9pm UTC)

Mini-Challenges:

Crueltide | Femslash Festivus | Yulebuilding | Three Turtle Doves | Two for One | Yuleporn  
Family Matters | Queering the Tide | Yuletide Madness Drabble Invitational | TransTide 
Chromatic Yuletide | Unconventionyule | Wrapping Paper | Babytide | MultiLingYule 

Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespace drama 18+ discussion. Google Group for PHs.

yuletide | yuletide_admin | App
2025 Collection | Tagset | Letters

Flat / Recent | Top-Level (Last) | FAQ | Search

 

Comments

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

I like that you're glossing over the part where the mod shared their direct correspondence with the recip (including follow-up), and people called the recip a liar.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

I'm replying to a post that said there'd be 100+ hits on the fic from people in the server going to look and disputing the number of people, which is not 100+ or anywhere close to it.

The post calling them a liar is the one with 4 reacts, one of which is a thumbs down.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

Do you really think that everyone who looked at the fic participated in the discussion in some way (even by emoji react)?

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

Not necessarily, but generally if only 10ish people are willing to react to a conversation you aren't going to get 100+ people searching for the fic (it wasn't linked) to read it. You're still at a handful no matter how you slice it.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

That's not really true, when something is linked here or on another anon meme sometimes no one replies but the hits shoot way up

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

Jesus. Can someone name the mods and their events so we can decide to not cross paths with them?

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

Oof. If the mod felt the need to share my 3-sentence follow-up where I accepted their decision, clarified my reasoning, and thanked them for their work, I think there's no doubt they were being malicious here. /RS recip

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

They didn't. This is a malicious representation of that conversation. The issue was discussed at a high level and everyone taking part knew (or should have known, OP) that the gist was being loosely summarized only.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

I didn't say it was verbatim and am not sure why you're defending these assholes.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

DC

You are writing RPF about the mod server and getting mad when your fanfic is corrected. This doesn't give us a lot of faith in your version of events.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

You're not

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

I think we should extend some grace to someone who just learned that their personal conversation with an event organizer might have been shared, discussed, evaluated and even heavily criticized in a discord of 100, all of have some kind of power in the exchange scene. This would be very upsetting and infuriating to me too.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

Well this comment's aged poorly.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

There was only one asshole.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

New favourite trope.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

"share my 3-sentence follow-up"

If we're not meant to take this as literally sharing the correspondence, I think you need to speak more precisely.

And correcting the record isn't defending the assholes. It's correcting the record.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

lmao how can you say this when the mod did in fact copy/paste the recip's correspondence word for word? Both the original correspondence and the recip's response? Why are you caping for them?

After the third or fourth person chimed in to say "yeah I don't think this warrants an EPH" they should have said "thanks everyone!" and left it there rather than continually updating us on developments as they arose.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

SC like how else would I know that the recip responded like this, unless you think I'm the recip?

"Gotcha. It also really read like [possible DNW] and the two things combined rubbed me up the wrong way, so I thought I'd reach out to you guys. Thanks for checking this out for me."

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

Does Relationshipping mod pay your bills or what? Because why in the world would you lie so openly and gaslight the two persons who reported and assumed correctly.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

Do you even actually know it was you? I have yet to see anyone confirm this, or even confirm which exchange it was, but you've gone from "this might be me" to "if it was RS, there's a 99% chance it was me" to "it was definitely me" over the course of this thread.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

I hope no one does confirm which exchange it was. It sounds like the mod just asked for advice and the real shitty behavior happened afterwards.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

+1

For all we know this is about some random single fandom exchange we've never heard of.

Disclaimer I am not there and have no idea, I'm just looking at the mention of 100+ mods and thinking that seems like way too many mods for it to be limited to our normal BFE range.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

DC

I'm not in the server but a lot of servers have a lot of inactive (but potentially lurky) members because they don't actively boot people who've drifted out of the scene.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

DC

If EPH coalie is off track, I think it would be gracious that coalies in the know corrected the record. For the sake of everyone involved.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

SC

I mean correct the record with respect to the exchange where this happened.