coalcube: (coaltide)
coalie ([personal profile] coalcube) wrote in [community profile] coaltide2025-09-13 02:19 pm
Entry tags:

*Notices Yuletide*

OwO What's This?

Monday 15 to Friday 26 September: Nominations (end 9pm UTC 26 September) | Evidence Post | RPF Coordination | Promo Post
Tuesday 14 to Friday 24 October: Sign-ups (end 9pm UTC 24 October)
Sunday 26 October: Assignments out (may be earlier)
Wednesday 10 December: Default deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 17 December: Assignment deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 24 December: Main collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 25 December: Madness collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 1 January: Author reveals, end of event (9pm UTC)

Mini-Challenges:

Crueltide | Femslash Festivus | Yulebuilding | Three Turtle Doves | Two for One | Yuleporn  
Family Matters | Queering the Tide | Yuletide Madness Drabble Invitational | TransTide 
Chromatic Yuletide | Unconventionyule | Wrapping Paper | Babytide | MultiLingYule 

Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespace drama 18+ discussion. Google Group for PHs.


Flat / Recent | Top-Level (Last) | FAQ | Search
 

Re: Mod Cabal

(Anonymous) 2025-09-21 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
"share my 3-sentence follow-up"

If we're not meant to take this as literally sharing the correspondence, I think you need to speak more precisely.

And correcting the record isn't defending the assholes. It's correcting the record.

Re: Mod Cabal

(Anonymous) 2025-09-21 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
SC

Sorry, being more precise myself, I feel that "the mod shared their direct correspondence with the recip (including follow-up)" implies pretty heavily that it was verbatin, which it was not.

Your/recip's responding hypothetical was reasonable, "if the mod shared...". They didn't, anyway.

Re: Mod Cabal

(Anonymous) 2025-09-22 06:27 am (UTC)(link)
It was verbatim.