Entry tags:
Coal All The Way
It's coal-bo time.
Yuleporn | Make the Yuletide Gay / TNB+ | Femslash Festivus
YuleBuilding | Two for One | Crueltide | Misses Clause
YuleSwaps | IF | Wrapping Paper
Yuletide Discord for Hippos. Google Group for PHs. F_F wiki for history.
Yuleporn | Make the Yuletide Gay / TNB+ | Femslash Festivus
YuleBuilding | Two for One | Crueltide | Misses Clause
YuleSwaps | IF | Wrapping Paper
Yuletide Discord for Hippos. Google Group for PHs. F_F wiki for history.

Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:24 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:31 am (UTC)(link)I haaaaaate true crime but again, I don’t think that stance is activism and will not waste my free time crusading against its stans. It’s the same with antis. If you spend as much/more time policing the shit you hate as you do with the things you like, then you’re essentially in the fandom/shipping that ship as much as the people that like it. It is in your head and taking your energy from engaging/creating content for good shit. If your idea is fun is being negatiive in that way then....okay. But that will be a big pass from me.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:34 am (UTC)(link)What's with the persistent assumption that "responding to someone reccing Nazi shit in a way they think is subtle enough to get nonnies into it" is taking up so much of our time? We're in the YT thread to talk about plenty of things having to do with YT.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:48 am (UTC)(link)yes we all know the ph is the only issue here. that is why it is always said that it is tedious when you act like nazism is your actual issue. it isn’t, see: every other nazi canon getting a pass.
charité at war was recced here and on ffa about ten times - nobody left so much as an “ew” comment. zero peeps re: the person asking for the canon gay couple consisting of two real life nazis who were also against the regime. a fic is in the collection for charité and it is crickets. nazis are obvi not the issue lol
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:52 am (UTC)(link)I mean, this is what I've been saying the whole time. It's not about the canon, it's about the fact that this one specific user kinks on the real-life Third Reich and as yet fails to understand that they can't trick people into sharing their kink.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:55 am (UTC)(link)small fandom-dom.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:55 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:32 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:53 am (UTC)(link)No, as people have explained at length, it's Aquatics' persistent twattery re. Nazis that is the issue.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:00 am (UTC)(link)so the issue only comes in if they’re an active exchange participant that ends up on the ph list a lot? i guess i’m missing how they’re jedi mind tricking people to get into dp but a fandom like c@w is fine. in seven months, if the fans are still pitching it, then it becomes an issue?
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:03 am (UTC)(link)Because one is "this fits your request but jsyk it's about Nazis" and the other is "this is so hot and cute (5 comments later) oh, well, you've found out it's about Nazis, I guess everyone can't be as dispassionate as I am and properly appreciate how brave and adorable the Wehrmacht was"
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:09 am (UTC)(link)I don't actually care about the pinch hit thing, although it would probably be prudent for Aquatics to recognize that Desert Peach is a very niche fandom more suited to Yuletide and the few other large exchanges like ToT than to small ones where it's very unlikely to get a match.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:31 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:37 am (UTC)(link)I don't want actual Nazis in fandom (or, like, anywhere, ideally). That doesn't mean I have a problem with canons and fanfic featuring Nazis.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 09:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 16:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:19 am (UTC)(link)Honestly I wish I could modcall now. Neither side of this debate should have airtime because it has nothing to do with Yuletide/exchanges.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 06:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 06:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:53 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:02 am (UTC)(link)That and I'm at least provisionally prepared to believe that Charité at War actually is a nuanced look at the lives of ordinary Germans under Nazism, instead of whatever fetishy borderline apologetics shit is going on with Desert Peach. It may be less intrinsically hate-worthy.
I don't know; I haven't seen it. But it seems unlikely to me that German prestige television would produce something that dodgy on this topic.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:11 am (UTC)(link)I guess its a YMMV thing but I believe that messy fandoms can have nuanced requests and people fan make the most messy requests of nuanced fandoms. Just because the source is morally good doesn’t mean you can’t request ‘A/B save Rohm’s life at the hospital and they run off to live together as an OT3’.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:25 am (UTC)(link)But when someone is busily pimping a canon it obviously matters whether the canon itself is dodgy, and if their pimping behavior involves the sort of sketchy bait-and-switch tactics Aquatics likes to use, that's going to reinforce people's doubts about the canon because look at the creepy fans it apparently attracts.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:03 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 07:01 am (UTC)(link)That is... what pinch hitters do. It’s how pinch hits get picked up.
Anyway, it’s clearly not similar pimping since I’m one of those ~stalkers and have never heard of it before you pulled this bit of whataboutism. Dememe pulls up one result, which admittedly mentions another rec. If you’re talking about YT pimping, fine, but those posts are not even the start of people’s issues.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:49 am (UTC)(link)