Entry tags:
Coal All The Way
It's coal-bo time.
Yuleporn | Make the Yuletide Gay / TNB+ | Femslash Festivus
YuleBuilding | Two for One | Crueltide | Misses Clause
YuleSwaps | IF | Wrapping Paper
Yuletide Discord for Hippos. Google Group for PHs. F_F wiki for history.
Yuleporn | Make the Yuletide Gay / TNB+ | Femslash Festivus
YuleBuilding | Two for One | Crueltide | Misses Clause
YuleSwaps | IF | Wrapping Paper
Yuletide Discord for Hippos. Google Group for PHs. F_F wiki for history.

Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:48 am (UTC)(link)yes we all know the ph is the only issue here. that is why it is always said that it is tedious when you act like nazism is your actual issue. it isn’t, see: every other nazi canon getting a pass.
charité at war was recced here and on ffa about ten times - nobody left so much as an “ew” comment. zero peeps re: the person asking for the canon gay couple consisting of two real life nazis who were also against the regime. a fic is in the collection for charité and it is crickets. nazis are obvi not the issue lol
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:52 am (UTC)(link)I mean, this is what I've been saying the whole time. It's not about the canon, it's about the fact that this one specific user kinks on the real-life Third Reich and as yet fails to understand that they can't trick people into sharing their kink.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:55 am (UTC)(link)small fandom-dom.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:55 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:32 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:53 am (UTC)(link)No, as people have explained at length, it's Aquatics' persistent twattery re. Nazis that is the issue.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:00 am (UTC)(link)so the issue only comes in if they’re an active exchange participant that ends up on the ph list a lot? i guess i’m missing how they’re jedi mind tricking people to get into dp but a fandom like c@w is fine. in seven months, if the fans are still pitching it, then it becomes an issue?
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:03 am (UTC)(link)Because one is "this fits your request but jsyk it's about Nazis" and the other is "this is so hot and cute (5 comments later) oh, well, you've found out it's about Nazis, I guess everyone can't be as dispassionate as I am and properly appreciate how brave and adorable the Wehrmacht was"
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:09 am (UTC)(link)I don't actually care about the pinch hit thing, although it would probably be prudent for Aquatics to recognize that Desert Peach is a very niche fandom more suited to Yuletide and the few other large exchanges like ToT than to small ones where it's very unlikely to get a match.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:31 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:37 am (UTC)(link)I don't want actual Nazis in fandom (or, like, anywhere, ideally). That doesn't mean I have a problem with canons and fanfic featuring Nazis.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:41 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 08:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 09:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) - 2019-12-29 16:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:45 am (UTC)(link)I'm genuinely curious if this makes me an asshole in some people's eyes, given the whole Desert Peach discussion. I would hope not, but if so, I'd love to discuss it.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:47 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:19 am (UTC)(link)Honestly I wish I could modcall now. Neither side of this debate should have airtime because it has nothing to do with Yuletide/exchanges.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:24 am (UTC)(link)Your bad writing doesn’t have enough traction to get a fandom, sadly. It’ll be aquatics 2.0 with nonstop IPHs.
Work with what a real pro made if your 9/11 boner is so hard https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Films_based_on_the_September_11_attacks
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:53 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:02 am (UTC)(link)That and I'm at least provisionally prepared to believe that Charité at War actually is a nuanced look at the lives of ordinary Germans under Nazism, instead of whatever fetishy borderline apologetics shit is going on with Desert Peach. It may be less intrinsically hate-worthy.
I don't know; I haven't seen it. But it seems unlikely to me that German prestige television would produce something that dodgy on this topic.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:11 am (UTC)(link)I guess its a YMMV thing but I believe that messy fandoms can have nuanced requests and people fan make the most messy requests of nuanced fandoms. Just because the source is morally good doesn’t mean you can’t request ‘A/B save Rohm’s life at the hospital and they run off to live together as an OT3’.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:25 am (UTC)(link)But when someone is busily pimping a canon it obviously matters whether the canon itself is dodgy, and if their pimping behavior involves the sort of sketchy bait-and-switch tactics Aquatics likes to use, that's going to reinforce people's doubts about the canon because look at the creepy fans it apparently attracts.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:03 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 07:01 am (UTC)(link)That is... what pinch hitters do. It’s how pinch hits get picked up.
Anyway, it’s clearly not similar pimping since I’m one of those ~stalkers and have never heard of it before you pulled this bit of whataboutism. Dememe pulls up one result, which admittedly mentions another rec. If you’re talking about YT pimping, fine, but those posts are not even the start of people’s issues.