Entry tags:
Coal All The Way
It's coal-bo time.
Yuleporn | Make the Yuletide Gay / TNB+ | Femslash Festivus
YuleBuilding | Two for One | Crueltide | Misses Clause
YuleSwaps | IF | Wrapping Paper
Yuletide Discord for Hippos. Google Group for PHs. F_F wiki for history.
Yuleporn | Make the Yuletide Gay / TNB+ | Femslash Festivus
YuleBuilding | Two for One | Crueltide | Misses Clause
YuleSwaps | IF | Wrapping Paper
Yuletide Discord for Hippos. Google Group for PHs. F_F wiki for history.

Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 05:53 am (UTC)(link)No, as people have explained at length, it's Aquatics' persistent twattery re. Nazis that is the issue.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:00 am (UTC)(link)so the issue only comes in if they’re an active exchange participant that ends up on the ph list a lot? i guess i’m missing how they’re jedi mind tricking people to get into dp but a fandom like c@w is fine. in seven months, if the fans are still pitching it, then it becomes an issue?
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:03 am (UTC)(link)Because one is "this fits your request but jsyk it's about Nazis" and the other is "this is so hot and cute (5 comments later) oh, well, you've found out it's about Nazis, I guess everyone can't be as dispassionate as I am and properly appreciate how brave and adorable the Wehrmacht was"
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:09 am (UTC)(link)I don't actually care about the pinch hit thing, although it would probably be prudent for Aquatics to recognize that Desert Peach is a very niche fandom more suited to Yuletide and the few other large exchanges like ToT than to small ones where it's very unlikely to get a match.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:31 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:37 am (UTC)(link)I don't want actual Nazis in fandom (or, like, anywhere, ideally). That doesn't mean I have a problem with canons and fanfic featuring Nazis.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:41 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:46 am (UTC)(link)I don't even understand what you're saying.
I also want any actual rapists in fandom, but I want all the noncon fic to stay. That's exactly the same principle for me.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:49 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:53 am (UTC)(link)That doesn’t mean you get to make that decision for other people who see it as a normal small fandom behavior for someone trying to make their fandom happen when it never will. They are free to not care a wink and ignore them once they decide the fandom is/isn’t for them.
Dog whistling so much that people see anti red flags from you while you insist that you are the one person who does all this anti behavior yet isn’t a big wanky mess is gaslighting too, by that standard.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:55 am (UTC)(link)(Except I don't think either is gaslighting.)
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:56 am (UTC)(link)(I don’t either.)
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 09:53 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)Oh, the irony.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:45 am (UTC)(link)I'm genuinely curious if this makes me an asshole in some people's eyes, given the whole Desert Peach discussion. I would hope not, but if so, I'd love to discuss it.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 08:47 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:19 am (UTC)(link)Honestly I wish I could modcall now. Neither side of this debate should have airtime because it has nothing to do with Yuletide/exchanges.
Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: Diamonds
(Anonymous) 2019-12-29 06:24 am (UTC)(link)Your bad writing doesn’t have enough traction to get a fandom, sadly. It’ll be aquatics 2.0 with nonstop IPHs.
Work with what a real pro made if your 9/11 boner is so hard https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Films_based_on_the_September_11_attacks