coalcube: (coaltide)
coalie ([personal profile] coalcube) wrote in [community profile] coaltide2025-09-13 02:19 pm
Entry tags:

*Notices Yuletide*

OwO What's This?

Monday 15 to Friday 26 September: Nominations (end 9pm UTC 26 September) | Evidence Post | RPF Coordination | Promo Post
Tuesday 14 to Friday 24 October: Sign-ups (end 9pm UTC 24 October)
Sunday 26 October: Assignments out (may be earlier)
Wednesday 10 December: Default deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 17 December: Assignment deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 24 December: Main collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 25 December: Madness collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 1 January: Author reveals, end of event (9pm UTC)

Mini-Challenges:

Crueltide | Femslash Festivus | Yulebuilding | Three Turtle Doves | Two for One | Yuleporn  
Family Matters | Queering the Tide | Yuletide Madness Drabble Invitational | TransTide 
Chromatic Yuletide | Unconventionyule | Wrapping Paper | Babytide | MultiLingYule 

Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespace drama 18+ discussion. Google Group for PHs.


Flat / Recent | Top-Level (Last) | FAQ | Search
 

Re: Mod Cabal

(Anonymous) 2025-09-23 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)
DC

How did the RS mod know it wasn't a rehash of the recipient's prompt/letter if the gift was too squicky for them to read in the first place? Like, did they ask the server for the rehash check, rejected, then asked the server again for the bash DNW, and rejected again?

Re: Mod Cabal

(Anonymous) 2025-09-23 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)
SC I will spiritually send whoever pastes the log 5 dollars, or the equivalent in their local currency. I am willing to negotiate.

Re: Mod Cabal

(Anonymous) 2025-09-24 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
How did the RS mod know it wasn't a rehash of the recipient's prompt/letter if the gift was too squicky for them to read in the first place?

Because they asked for a couple of volunteers on the mod server to read it for them and help them make a judgment call, which is what OP of this entire thread is complaining about.

Re: Mod Cabal

(Anonymous) 2025-09-24 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
My question is if they rejected it by themselves the first time and then asked the server for the second rejection, or if they asked the server for both rejections.

Re: Mod Cabal

(Anonymous) 2025-09-24 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
They asked the server both times, even though they'd already decided no EPH. That's why it felt so cruel: the mod had already made up their mind, yet they were inviting additional scrutiny that wasn't constructive.