*Notices Yuletide*

[coalcube]

OwO What's This?

Monday 15 to Friday 26 September: Nominations (end 9pm UTC 26 September) | Evidence Post | RPF Coordination | Promo Post
Tuesday 14 to Friday 24 October: Sign-ups (end 9pm UTC 24 October)
Sunday 26 October: Assignments out (may be earlier)
Wednesday 10 December: Default deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 17 December: Assignment deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 24 December: Main collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 25 December: Madness collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 1 January: Author reveals, end of event (9pm UTC)

Mini-Challenges:

Crueltide | Femslash Festivus | Yulebuilding | Three Turtle Doves | Two for One | Yuleporn  
Family Matters | Queering the Tide | Yuletide Madness Drabble Invitational | TransTide 
Chromatic Yuletide | Unconventionyule | Wrapping Paper | Babytide | MultiLingYule 

Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespace drama 18+ discussion. Google Group for PHs.

yuletide | yuletide_admin | App
2025 Collection | Tagset | Letters

Flat / Recent | Top-Level (Last) | FAQ | Search

 

Comments

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

How did the RS mod know it wasn't a rehash of the recipient's prompt/letter if the gift was too squicky for them to read in the first place?

Because they asked for a couple of volunteers on the mod server to read it for them and help them make a judgment call, which is what OP of this entire thread is complaining about.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

My question is if they rejected it by themselves the first time and then asked the server for the second rejection, or if they asked the server for both rejections.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

They asked the server both times, even though they'd already decided no EPH. That's why it felt so cruel: the mod had already made up their mind, yet they were inviting additional scrutiny that wasn't constructive.