*Notices Yuletide*

[coalcube]

OwO What's This?

Monday 15 to Friday 26 September: Nominations (end 9pm UTC 26 September) | Evidence Post | RPF Coordination | Promo Post
Tuesday 14 to Friday 24 October: Sign-ups (end 9pm UTC 24 October)
Sunday 26 October: Assignments out (may be earlier)
Wednesday 10 December: Default deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 17 December: Assignment deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 24 December: Main collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 25 December: Madness collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 1 January: Author reveals, end of event (9pm UTC)

Mini-Challenges:

Crueltide | Femslash Festivus | Yulebuilding | Three Turtle Doves | Two for One | Yuleporn  
Family Matters | Queering the Tide | Yuletide Madness Drabble Invitational | TransTide 
Chromatic Yuletide | Unconventionyule | Wrapping Paper | Babytide | MultiLingYule 

Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespace drama 18+ discussion. Google Group for PHs.

yuletide | yuletide_admin | App
2025 Collection | Tagset | Letters

Flat / Recent | Top-Level (Last) | FAQ | Search

 

Comments

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

You were never named, if it's you. Even the exchange wasn't named.

It was just a handful of people in the conversation and the whole thing was very vague on identity unless you already knew what they were talking about. The request to read the fic did not come with a link so I assume it was sent privately.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

DC

Did we read the same conversation? The mod vagued in sufficient detail that the work was immediately identifiable. And when someone said "Oh if you're talking about the X/Y fic in [Fandom]..." everyone went to to look and give their own opinion. There was little-to-no pushback, not even from the server mod.

The recip was never named, and the exchange was never named. But we all knew who was involved.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

I didn't know who was involved, so no we all did not know who was involved. I still don't know who was involved!

I didn't see that particular comment though, so that could be part of why.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

Give more info PLEASE.

Re: Mod Cabal

[(Anonymous)]

Talk about misrepresentation...

No, the exchange wasn't named, but when the Relationshipping Mod posts about an EPH, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that the exchange just might be Relationshipping. Especially when there's ongoing talk of incest and a 500 word minimum. I don't know any other exchanges that fulfill both of those requirements.

And when one of the first replies is, "If it's the [fandom] [pairing type fic], then..." there's actually no need to name the recipient at that point, since they've already been identified. There's only one fic that fits the bill.

I'm not sure why you're downplaying something so egregious.