Entry tags:
*Notices Yuletide*
OwO What's This?
Monday 15 to Friday 26 September: Nominations (end 9pm UTC 26 September) | Evidence Post | RPF Coordination | Promo Post
Tuesday 14 to Friday 24 October: Sign-ups (end 9pm UTC 24 October)
Sunday 26 October: Assignments out (may be earlier)
Wednesday 10 December: Default deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 17 December: Assignment deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 24 December: Main collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 25 December: Madness collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 1 January: Author reveals, end of event (9pm UTC)
Mini-Challenges:
Crueltide | Femslash Festivus | Yulebuilding | Three Turtle Doves | Two for One | Yuleporn
Family Matters | Queering the Tide | Yuletide Madness Drabble Invitational | TransTide
Chromatic Yuletide | Unconventionyule | Wrapping Paper | Babytide | MultiLingYule
Tuesday 14 to Friday 24 October: Sign-ups (end 9pm UTC 24 October)
Sunday 26 October: Assignments out (may be earlier)
Wednesday 10 December: Default deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 17 December: Assignment deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 24 December: Main collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 25 December: Madness collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 1 January: Author reveals, end of event (9pm UTC)
Mini-Challenges:
Crueltide | Femslash Festivus | Yulebuilding | Three Turtle Doves | Two for One | Yuleporn
Family Matters | Queering the Tide | Yuletide Madness Drabble Invitational | TransTide
Chromatic Yuletide | Unconventionyule | Wrapping Paper | Babytide | MultiLingYule
Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespace

Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-21 05:57 pm (UTC)(link)I don't have any History or past negative experiences with people in the exchange community, so I'll admit I'm curious about the person who bashed me and why they did so (provided this whole thing is actually about my gift lol).
Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-21 05:59 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-21 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)It was just a handful of people in the conversation and the whole thing was very vague on identity unless you already knew what they were talking about. The request to read the fic did not come with a link so I assume it was sent privately.
Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-21 06:59 pm (UTC)(link)Did we read the same conversation? The mod vagued in sufficient detail that the work was immediately identifiable. And when someone said "Oh if you're talking about the X/Y fic in [Fandom]..." everyone went to to look and give their own opinion. There was little-to-no pushback, not even from the server mod.
The recip was never named, and the exchange was never named. But we all knew who was involved.
Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-21 07:08 pm (UTC)(link)I didn't see that particular comment though, so that could be part of why.
Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-21 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-22 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)No, the exchange wasn't named, but when the Relationshipping Mod posts about an EPH, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that the exchange just might be Relationshipping. Especially when there's ongoing talk of incest and a 500 word minimum. I don't know any other exchanges that fulfill both of those requirements.
And when one of the first replies is, "If it's the [fandom] [pairing type fic], then..." there's actually no need to name the recipient at that point, since they've already been identified. There's only one fic that fits the bill.
I'm not sure why you're downplaying something so egregious.
Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-22 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-22 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)https://coaltide.dreamwidth.org/9042.html?thread=20024658#cmt20024658
Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-22 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)The recipient got a gift that gave them a bad feeling, and the mod asked for help because they were less experienced. It wasn't wise of them to give as many details as they did, but some other more experienced mods have also done that. The real bad behavior was from discord members who took everything in bad faith.
Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-22 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-22 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)Their response to the initial "Is it this fic?" should have been to ask that person to delete their comment as it contains identifying information, and kept the discussion to DMs.
Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-22 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)Someone should have; I judge them.
Re: Mod Cabal
(Anonymous) 2025-09-22 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)