coaltide | Coal All The Way

Entry tags:

2019

Coal All The Way

yuletide |

yuletide_admin | Writing Post
2019 Collection | 2019 Madness
2019 App | Letter Post (LJ)

Flat / Recent | Top-Level (Last) | Search

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Ahaha nice of you to admit it really is alllllll about the kink shaming for you and not about letter etiquette as you claimed. A+

LOL right?? Nice of them to come clean at last.

There wasn’t only one person in those threads. The majority but not all said they didn’t have a problem with the kink. No one was lying, except for you, now.

try harder, you aren't there yet

ohhh show me the lie, i dare you

+1 The threads are still right there for anyone to read.

what's your excuse for complaining about a pairing nomination then

if you aren't just a kink shamer

do you want to banish nominations to letters too

One person complained. One person is not the same as all people. One person and another person can agree on one thing and disagree about another.

You guys give me a headache.

Okay, slooooowly.

If you don't agree with OP, you should be arguing with them, not with the people who laughed at them.

The first six comments disagreed with OP. Your comment is still conflating two different stances, the people who genuinely just had a problem with the format vs. the people who said from the start that they were anti-kink, and making it into a false-flag operation. I do not doubt this is all making your brain hurt.

I can't tell if you're really stupid or really naive. Do you seriously think there are two clear, obvious different groups of people on your side? One who 100% honestly say and believe that kink is always wrong and one who 100% honestly say and believe the format is wrong and kink itself is fine? Seriously?

Look, OP is clearly a wanker. They went into the nominations of a different exchange to find a lesbian/guy pairing to complain about. Do you genuinely think an obvious wanker like that wouldn't say anything and everything they could think of in a wank?

I don't doubt they were all over the previous wank(s), spouting but letter! inbox! all over the place. Now it's clear and obvious they just hate kink.

And btw, you still haven't explained what part of "Ahaha nice of you to admit it really is alllllll about the kink shaming for you and not about letter etiquette as you claimed. A+" is a lie. No, really, do explain.

Yes, it is me who is the painfully stupid one, not the person who literally cannot comprehend that they are reading comments by at least two people with at least two differing opinions.

I did explain, but, clearly, understanding things that are placed right in front of you with as few small words as possible is not your strong suit. Now, excuse me, you’ve somehow gotten even more boring than my actual job.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2019-12-30 23:56 (UTC) - Expand

well if this kink's ok then why all the wank about heeroluva then? surely his kink is ok then!

Unrequested, untagged racist kink = bad, shows the author has racist views that they have internalized to the point of not even realizing they’re racist and, worse still, is forcing it on others unrequested.

Clearly aware of their kink enough to use a specific tag, requesting it and not forcing it on anyone/everyone can avoid if it isn’t their thing = you are free to side eye and avoid but they have done nothing wrong and only someone into the same thing as them will write it for them, thus no one is hurt. Until exchanges make letters a requirement, you have to understand that tags and sign up summaries are CNTW when it comes to canon spoilers and sketchy prompts. If you can’t handle that then you shouldn’t be looking through prompts/requests to begin with.

+1

and heeroluva wrote a DNW, that's a completely different situation

THIS

/DC who side-eyes and avoids Red Rum Raver's and Aquatics' requests but heeroluva is a whole new ball of wank.

This. I don't care what people request, everyone can do whatever they wnat in their own space. I care when people bring their shit into my space, my gift.

Did he though? Was the "no big breasts" DNW supposed to be a fiction DNW? It reads like an art DNW, which is not the same thing.

/doesn't care, thinks he's a creep, but the DNW thing has bugged me for a while

It wasn’t specified as an art-only DNW, no.

Not to say no one could ever be triggered by descriptions of big breasts, but tbh it still feels like the jaywalking in this situation.

DC

IIRC this may have been the last straw for someone. Heeroluva is known for writing to his own kinks rather than the recip's requests and this has been mentioned before. This incident was a step too far though, given the extreme nature of the unrequested kink and this time there was wank when before there had been one or two isolated complaints or mutterings.

It doesn't really matter if a DNW is triggering or not, wtf. You don't gift people something they clearly said they don't want, full stop. It's a clear rule violation unlike every other part of all these wanks.

What the hell, you don't get to decide if someone's DNWS count or not. No giant breasts is a clear DNW. You don't have to like it but you damn well have to respect it.

I can excuse racism, but I draw the line at violating DNWs about preferred tit sizes, etc., they’re both social constructs with arbitrarily determined severity and responses, meme so white, etc. etc. etc.

Aren't art-only DNWS usually labelled as such? Regardless, if you aren't sure, you ask through the mods, you don't just ignore a DNW.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only