(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
It wasn’t specified as an art-only DNW, no.

Not to say no one could ever be triggered by descriptions of big breasts, but tbh it still feels like the jaywalking in this situation.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
DC

IIRC this may have been the last straw for someone. Heeroluva is known for writing to his own kinks rather than the recip's requests and this has been mentioned before. This incident was a step too far though, given the extreme nature of the unrequested kink and this time there was wank when before there had been one or two isolated complaints or mutterings.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
It doesn't really matter if a DNW is triggering or not, wtf. You don't gift people something they clearly said they don't want, full stop. It's a clear rule violation unlike every other part of all these wanks.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
What the hell, you don't get to decide if someone's DNWS count or not. No giant breasts is a clear DNW. You don't have to like it but you damn well have to respect it.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I can excuse racism, but I draw the line at violating DNWs about preferred tit sizes, etc., they’re both social constructs with arbitrarily determined severity and responses, meme so white, etc. etc. etc.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Aw, such a pretty straw man! Paint some eyes on him and leave him to the crows!

(Anonymous) 2019-12-31 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
What else could bringing the focus back to the DNW breaking as the true, more critical social violation possibly mean? They both suck. One obviously sucks a whole lot more.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-31 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
Ah yes, only someone who loves racism could possibly think breaking a DNW is wrong. Perfect logic, coalie.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for the reminder to confirm my art-specific DNWs are labeled instead of relying on someone else to know the difference