(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Unrequested, untagged racist kink = bad, shows the author has racist views that they have internalized to the point of not even realizing they’re racist and, worse still, is forcing it on others unrequested.

Clearly aware of their kink enough to use a specific tag, requesting it and not forcing it on anyone/everyone can avoid if it isn’t their thing = you are free to side eye and avoid but they have done nothing wrong and only someone into the same thing as them will write it for them, thus no one is hurt. Until exchanges make letters a requirement, you have to understand that tags and sign up summaries are CNTW when it comes to canon spoilers and sketchy prompts. If you can’t handle that then you shouldn’t be looking through prompts/requests to begin with.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
+1

and heeroluva wrote a DNW, that's a completely different situation

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
THIS

/DC who side-eyes and avoids Red Rum Raver's and Aquatics' requests but heeroluva is a whole new ball of wank.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
This. I don't care what people request, everyone can do whatever they wnat in their own space. I care when people bring their shit into my space, my gift.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Did he though? Was the "no big breasts" DNW supposed to be a fiction DNW? It reads like an art DNW, which is not the same thing.

/doesn't care, thinks he's a creep, but the DNW thing has bugged me for a while

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
It wasn’t specified as an art-only DNW, no.

Not to say no one could ever be triggered by descriptions of big breasts, but tbh it still feels like the jaywalking in this situation.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
DC

IIRC this may have been the last straw for someone. Heeroluva is known for writing to his own kinks rather than the recip's requests and this has been mentioned before. This incident was a step too far though, given the extreme nature of the unrequested kink and this time there was wank when before there had been one or two isolated complaints or mutterings.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
It doesn't really matter if a DNW is triggering or not, wtf. You don't gift people something they clearly said they don't want, full stop. It's a clear rule violation unlike every other part of all these wanks.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
What the hell, you don't get to decide if someone's DNWS count or not. No giant breasts is a clear DNW. You don't have to like it but you damn well have to respect it.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I can excuse racism, but I draw the line at violating DNWs about preferred tit sizes, etc., they’re both social constructs with arbitrarily determined severity and responses, meme so white, etc. etc. etc.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Aw, such a pretty straw man! Paint some eyes on him and leave him to the crows!

(Anonymous) 2019-12-31 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
What else could bringing the focus back to the DNW breaking as the true, more critical social violation possibly mean? They both suck. One obviously sucks a whole lot more.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-31 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
Ah yes, only someone who loves racism could possibly think breaking a DNW is wrong. Perfect logic, coalie.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for the reminder to confirm my art-specific DNWs are labeled instead of relying on someone else to know the difference

(Anonymous) 2019-12-30 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Aren't art-only DNWS usually labelled as such? Regardless, if you aren't sure, you ask through the mods, you don't just ignore a DNW.