coalcube: (Default)
coalie ([personal profile] coalcube) wrote in [community profile] coaltide2025-10-26 01:46 pm
Entry tags:

One Wank After Another

A blank assignment is a funny thing, isn't it? When you have it, you don't appreciate it, and when you miss it, it's gone.


Wednesday 10 December: Default deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 17 December: Assignment deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 24 December: Main collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 25 December: Madness collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 1 January: Author reveals, end of event (9pm UTC)

Mini-Challenges:

Crueltide | Femslash Festivus | Yulebuilding | Three Turtle Doves | Two for One | Yuleporn  
Family Matters | Queering the Tide | Yuletide Madness Drabble Invitational | TransTide 
Chromatic Yuletide | Unconventionyule | Wrapping Paper | Babytide | MultiLingYule 

Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark for namespace drama 18+ discussion.

2025 Collection | 2025 Madness | Tagset | Letters

Flat / Recent | Top-Level (Last) | FAQ | Search
 

(Anonymous) 2025-11-02 06:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Which part of "I would not trash talk a fellow exchange participant in public namespace because I believe doing so is rude" is so difficult for you to understand?

I understand that's your belief. You haven't come close to articulating why. Why do you believe non-anon criticism is worse than anon?

(Also, LOL at the idea that saying something on coal is more visible than saying something on Twitter. How many people do you think come here???)

Mmm, bad math. I think it's absolutely believable that more people doing Yuletide are aware of this space (or FFA) than follow DG on Twitter. The wank only blew up after her comments were posted on anon forums.

But that's not my actual motivation for thinking complaining about your recip or your assignment in public namespace is bad.

I don't believe you, specifically because of your failure to articulate any reasoning for your belief.

(Anonymous) 2025-11-02 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
cyrt

No, I've said it, you just don't get it.

(Anonymous) 2025-11-02 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I salute your efforts, coalie.

(Anonymous) 2025-11-04 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
nc

I understand that's your belief. You haven't come close to articulating why.

Sincerely, why do you need them to articulate the way behind a belief? If that's their baseline, I don't understand how it matters why they believe what they believe just that they do and that's where the disagreement stems from.

(Anonymous) 2025-11-04 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
sc

The WHY behind a belief, good lord.