coalcube: (Default)
coalie ([personal profile] coalcube) wrote in [community profile] coaltide2025-10-26 01:46 pm
Entry tags:

One Wank After Another

A blank assignment is a funny thing, isn't it? When you have it, you don't appreciate it, and when you miss it, it's gone.


Wednesday 10 December: Default deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 17 December: Assignment deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 24 December: Main collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 25 December: Madness collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 1 January: Author reveals, end of event (9pm UTC)

Mini-Challenges:

Crueltide | Femslash Festivus | Yulebuilding | Three Turtle Doves | Two for One | Yuleporn  
Family Matters | Queering the Tide | Yuletide Madness Drabble Invitational | TransTide 
Chromatic Yuletide | Unconventionyule | Wrapping Paper | Babytide | MultiLingYule 

Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark for namespace drama 18+ discussion.

2025 Collection | 2025 Madness | Tagset | Letters

Flat / Recent | Top-Level (Last) | FAQ | Search
 

(Anonymous) 2025-10-31 02:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Overusing any stylistic and rhetorical device is bad. But "DNW: italics" (or even "DNW: italics for emphasis") isn't simply preventing overuse, it's preventing it altogether. If it's an accessibly issue, obviously that's fair. Otherwise, it's just a silly attempt at DNWing bad writing that's so broad it also catches a lot of things that are not bad writing and it will most likely make bad writing (which sometimes relies on emphasis markers to make sense) worse.

You can do it, of course. But, to paraphrase what you said, writers will have varying opinions about you limiting the stylistic tools they are allowed to use because you think you unlocked the secret to avoiding bad writing.