coalcube: (coaltide)
coalie ([personal profile] coalcube) wrote in [community profile] coaltide2025-09-13 02:19 pm
Entry tags:

*Notices Yuletide*

OwO What's This?

Monday 15 to Friday 26 September: Nominations (end 9pm UTC 26 September) | Evidence Post | RPF Coordination | Promo Post
Tuesday 14 to Friday 24 October: Sign-ups (end 9pm UTC 24 October)
Sunday 26 October: Assignments out (may be earlier)
Wednesday 10 December: Default deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 17 December: Assignment deadline (9pm UTC)
Wednesday 24 December: Main collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 25 December: Madness collection works reveals (9pm UTC)
Thursday 1 January: Author reveals, end of event (9pm UTC)

Mini-Challenges:

Crueltide | Femslash Festivus | Yulebuilding | Three Turtle Doves | Two for One | Yuleporn  
Family Matters | Queering the Tide | Yuletide Madness Drabble Invitational | TransTide 
Chromatic Yuletide | Unconventionyule | Wrapping Paper | Babytide | MultiLingYule 

Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespace drama 18+ discussion. Google Group for PHs.


Flat / Recent | Top-Level (Last) | FAQ | Search
 

Re: Mod Cabal

(Anonymous) 2025-09-28 05:29 pm (UTC)(link)
+1. There are plenty of reasonable EPH reasons that may not be explicitly stated in the rules. Plagiarism, spitefic... there was even something in BFE a few weeks ago about a noncon fic that linked to a Pinterest mood board with photos of underage actors. That's maybe not technically against any rules but it was removed from the collection regardless.

Most exchanges don't even have policies in their rules outlining what an EPH is and when you can ask for one. Relationshipping included — it just says if a gift breaks the rules then commenting isn't required. And when EPHs are advertised to the community, they usually (rightfully so) don't say the reason.

- iirc this recipient has successfully participated in multifandom events before, so I am also less inclined to be charitable in terms of event culture mismatch

That's also why this comment rubbed me the wrong way. (And CYRT's Badfic doesn't qualify for an EPH, which the recipient knew already rubbed me even worse.) The vast majority of people will successfully participate in many exchanges without ever needing to ask for an EPH. If the recip isn't known for bad exchange behavior, the much more reasonable assumption is that they, like many participants, just aren't clear on EPH rules. Assuming ill intent just because they've done exchanges before feels like such a weird leap.