coalcube: (diamond)
coalie ([personal profile] coalcube) wrote in [community profile] coaltide2024-10-20 09:54 am
Entry tags:

Demure

 
Default deadline: December 11 (9am UTC)  
Assignment deadline: December 18  (9am UTC)
Main Collection Opens: December 25 (9am UTC)  
Madness Opens: December 26 (9am UTC)  
Author reveals: January 1 (9am UTC)

Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespace drama 18+ discussion. Google Group for PHs.



(Anonymous) 2024-10-21 05:08 pm (UTC)(link)
you see, there's a thing called a "judgement call"

(Anonymous) 2024-10-21 05:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, and I would like to know where a person who'd ban Nazis would make that judgement call and draw the line. Because some of that other bigotry will affect me (and probably a lot of other exchange participants) dramatically more than some rando asshole jerking off to war criminals, and I want to see if their "but we're a ~community" is just empty bullshit or not.

(Anonymous) 2024-10-21 05:25 pm (UTC)(link)
it's genuinely very funny that you think grandstanding like this about hypotheticals on an anon meme is doing anything. it's even funnier that you think summarizing ars_belli's shit as "jerking off to war criminals" doesn't betray your own janky thinking.

(Anonymous) 2024-10-21 05:30 pm (UTC)(link)
CYRT

I'm talking specifically about drowned_in_wine / FakeCirila9, and that's precisely what they're doing. But the way you refuse to entertain that banning other RL bigotry might be more pressing and dismiss it as "hypothetical" tells me everything I need to know about you.

(Anonymous) 2024-10-21 05:34 pm (UTC)(link)
no you fucking moron, it's just literally hypothetical. name a name. what matters is the bigotry + the behavior. i'm not aware of any maga people participating in yuletide, if they are, they should be banned. but your specific hypothetical was about "bullying", a term so broad it could mean literally anything. in general, yes, if a notorious harasser is doing yuletide, they should be banned. you will note that this is hypothetical, based on your own excruciatingly vague criteria.

you are soapboxing anonymously about another anonymous person's motivations based on criteria you invented: you are being stupid