coalcube: (piece)
coalie ([personal profile] coalcube) wrote in [community profile] coaltide2023-12-25 08:12 am

Morbane's coal

In quantum wankchanics, Morbane's coal is a thought experiment, sometimes described as a paradox, of quantum wankerposition. In the thought experiment, a hypothetical gift may be considered simultaneously both the fic of your dreams (TFOYD) and coal, while it is unread state, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur.

The Coaltide interpretation implies that, after a while, the gift is simultaneously TFOYD and coal. Yet, when a coalie clicks on their gift, the coalie sees the gift either TFOYD or coal, not both TFOYD and coal. This poses the question of when exactly quantum wankerposition ends and reality resolves into one possibility or the other.

Madness Opens: Tuesday 26 December
Author Reveals: Monday 1 January


Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespace drama 18+ discussion. Google Group for PHs.



Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 06:50 pm (UTC)(link)
The entire argument is that both things are fine and normal to do, which yes, does imply a level of frequency that rises to the routine. Adult literacy is in crisis!

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 06:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Outside.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 06:52 pm (UTC)(link)
You first.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Done, now your turn.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 06:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Done, now your turn. :)

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
You didn't, I can see you.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 06:58 pm (UTC)(link)
In that case I'd like your opinion on my landing strip. 5 stars? 10?

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Can't see it through the cloud of flies, sorry.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) - 2023-12-26 19:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
It's fine and normal to do when you hate a gift. I worry about more than your literacy if you think people routinely reject fics they don't hate.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 06:58 pm (UTC)(link)
No, it's not, because it's not normal to hate a gift simply for not being well written. Sorry. There is at least one nonny in this thread who has said they reject gifts, plural, which implies this happening with some degree of regularity. Again, the emotional intensity is the problem: if you find yourself viscerally hating a fic that does not contain your DNWs, is not spitefic, etc., then that is an emotional regulation issue. It is, quite literally, not mockingly, a personal problem. And it's a bad way to approach exchanges because a lot of people just aren't very good writers. If you find yourself hating fic so much that you'll resent its existence as your gift, you should remove yourself from the situation causing stress (your exchange participation).

Outside the opposite-world fishbowl of anon exchange wank, this is the normal way to think and behave. Sorry if that upsets you.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)
There's no such thing as "the" normal way to think and behave.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Bzzt wrongo, norms exist.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
And are different in different places and among different groups of people.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Indeed! We are talking about a group of people with established norms. Your grasping desperation to insist being out of pocket and rude is totally normal because [hits bong] what is a NORM, really? is very obviously a side effect of your illness and immaturity. Get well soon, etc.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)
What if you're really the rude one?

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) - 2023-12-26 19:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) - 2023-12-26 20:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I don't think you're in any position to lecture anyone about good manners. You condescending twat.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) - 2023-12-26 19:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I'm sure a person who armchair diagnoses strangers on the internet as mentally ill and uses that as an attack is someone who has an A+ grasp on social norms and politeness.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) - 2023-12-26 19:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) - 2023-12-26 19:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Is this is a new fishspeaker tactic to get people to yell at you?

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) - 2023-12-28 11:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) - 2023-12-28 11:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) - 2023-12-29 00:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
20 years hasn't passed, you should still be in a field. Go on, shoo.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I've rejected a handful of gifts. I've also received a medium-size three digit number of exchange gifts. That's a vanishingly rare percentage that I hate.

And it's a bad way to approach exchanges because a lot of people just aren't very good writers.

If I felt that way, I wouldn't do exchanges. Most people who do exchanges are decent to good writers. Most gifts are good. Some are mind-blowingly amazing. Just because a small percentage sucks badly, I'm not going to stop doing exchanges.

If you think "most people are bad at it" is a normal way to approach exchanges, I'm sorry. That sounds like an utterly miserable experience. I hope it will improve for you eventually, or you'll find another hobby where you don't think most other people aren't not up to your standards.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Nice condescension! People like you are miserable as recips and writers, but by all means, keep clinging to the odd sense of superiority that leads you to think being an entitled little shitbird is not just normal but also desirable.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Touch grass, touch grass, touch grass

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Superiority over someone like you? Oh, honey. That's not terribly difficult.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2023-12-26 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Cope and seethe, nonny.

Re: Potentially Fresh Wank?

(Anonymous) 2024-02-01 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)
"A lot of people" does not mean "most". You pulled that out of a hat.

DC, but above coalie's point stands. In an anonymous exchange there will always be a risk of getting a mid or even subpar gift despite the best efforts of literally everybody involved, from author to recipient to mod team. The charitable approach to this - the approach that will keep exchanges a largely positive experience for everyone involved - is to accept such gifts graciously in the spirit in which they were meant. If doing this is such a big ask because you viscerally cannot stand the feeling of having a well-intentioned but meh gift on your Gifts page, then yeah, that is a you problem and your attitude does not belong in exchanges.