And another one!

[coalcube]

I see my nemesis getting a fic that I love
And I'm like, "Fuck you" 
I guess my 10k letter wasn't enough
I'm like, "Fuck you and fuck morbane, too"
Said, "If I was a long commenter, they woulda gamed for me"
Ha, now ain't that some shit?
(Ain't that some shit?)
And although there's pain in my chest
I still comment it's the best
And runs to coal to shout "Fuck you" 

Nominations: Monday 18 to Thursday 28 September (Coordination | Evidence Post)
Sign-ups: Friday 13 to Saturday 21 October (NYR | Promo Post)
Assignments Out: Monday 23 October (may be earlier)
Default Deadline: Monday 11 December
Assignment Deadline: Monday 18 December
Main Collection Opens: Monday 25 December
Madness Opens: Tuesday 26 December
Author Reveals: Monday 1 January


Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespace drama 18+ discussion. Google Group for PHs.

yuletide | yuletide_admin | App
2023 Collection | Tagset

Flat / Recent | Top-Level (Last) | FAQ | Search

Comments

Re: my greatest yuletide fantasy

[(Anonymous)]

I assume you wouldn't write ducks fucking either if you don't accept that it's human/animal, so your opinion is irrelevant

Re: my greatest yuletide fantasy

[(Anonymous)]

Maybe by the letter of the law, but… look, if you’ve got the confidence to write cloaca porn in the face of a bestiality DNW, more power to you. I’d assume they likely weren’t into detailed bird genitals unless they specifically requested them, just to be on the safe side, but maybe that’s just me!

Re: my greatest yuletide fantasy

[(Anonymous)]

DC

If they requested shipfic about animal cartoon characters, I wouldn't even consider that a DNW that's about human/animal intercourse applies. It's not about "the letter of the law", it's about words meaning things. When two cats fuck in the wild, not a single person thinkings of that as bestiality because bestiality is something else.

Re: my greatest yuletide fantasy

[(Anonymous)]

I’m not saying the DNW applies. I’m saying I would be hesitant to include nonhuman genitalia for a recip who DNWs bestiality and does not request nonhuman genitalia, because I’d have no indication that they would enjoy it. Lots of people enjoy cartoon birds but do not enjoy cloaca sex, and I think there is a lot of overlap between people who DNW bestiality and people who do not enjoy cloacas.

If I get one (1) more reply saying “but no bestiality doesn’t RULE OUT cloacas” I s2g

Re: my greatest yuletide fantasy

[(Anonymous)]

lol if it helps, I agree with you; dnw bestiality means no knots or corkscrew dicks or whatever unless opted in to in an exchange, even though that's not bestiality by definition

Re: my greatest yuletide fantasy

[(Anonymous)]

DC

If you don't want them, make sure to DNW them if you request xeno, furry or similar, because DNW: bestiality is not that.
A mod wouldn't give you an EPH for a bestiality DNW violation because you hate a cloaca in your Daisy Duck PWP gift. They would give you an EPH if Daisy Duck fucked a non-sentient animal.
I can see it as getting too close to the DNW if the sentient animal looks too much like an actual animal, but this is really not this case. If a duck wears clothes, has a human house, lives in a human city and uses their wings as arms, it's way too human to be close to bestiality. If someone wrote Simba/Nala porn, I can see how it'd get closer to the DNW (but still not bestiality).

Re: my greatest yuletide fantasy

[(Anonymous)]

We have very different approaches to this and that's cool.

Re: my greatest yuletide fantasy

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

I just think it has nothing to do with bestiality. I wouldn't write nonhuman genitalia for a recip who doesn't in any way indicate they want to read about nonhuman genitalia. Whether or not they also DNW bestiality is completely irrelevant IMO.

Re: my greatest yuletide fantasy

[(Anonymous)]

NC Look, if someone requests, IDK, Wee John/Izzy with no bestiality, I will not write them a fic where Wee John secretly has octopus genitals. That's an asshole move.

If someone requests Ariel/Ursula with no bestiality? I totally am. A) requesting part-animal-people porn is opting into animal parts; B) furries (and furry-adjacent Disney porn fandom) have well-established definitions that I will assume you also know: c) if you can't be bothered to think through your DNWs in depth as they relate to your specific requests I can't either.