The Coal Game

[coalcube]

We're scrolling
And watching coalies make errors
The most pathetical errors!
We're watching experienced coalies
Who stayed up all night tracking a source in its original Latin
Up, writin'
And writin' bad!

Default deadline: Sat 11 Dec
Assignment deadline: Sat 18 Dec
Reveals: Sat 25 Dec

Mini-Challenges:
Yuleporn | Make the Yuletide Gay | Jewltide | Three Turtle Doves
YuleBuilding | Two for One | Crueltide | Yuletunes | Yule Be First
YuleSwaps | IF | Wrapping Paper | Yumadrin | MultiLingYule
....and a Partridge in a Pear Tree!

Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespace drama 18+ discussion. Google Group for PHs.

yuletide | yuletide_admin | Writing Post
2021 Collection | 2021 App (bonus + challenges) | Letter Post

Flat / Recent | Top-Level (Last) | FAQ | Search

Comments

Re: Smut opt in vs opt out

[(Anonymous)]

How I determine it:

1. Does the canon have sex scenes?

If yes, the canonical level of explicitness of those scenes is opt-out.

If no, all sex is opt-in.

2. Do the characters themselves have sex scenes?

If yes, the types of sex they have (if there's a stated top/bottom, if they make jokes about handcuffs, if you see them have sex in bathrooms or in their office, etc) are opt-out.

If no, anything beyond fade-to-black or vague, missionary-style vanilla sex is opt-in.

3. Does the person requesting say what kind of sex they do like?

If yes, stick to that generally and don't go beyond extremely related kinks (if they list oral sex as a like and don't mention spitting or swallowing, the author can make that call) when writing their sex scenes even if the kinks they like differ or contract what we know to be the character's canon sex life.

If no, anything beyond what is mentioned in canon is opt-in.