Coal All The Way

[coalcube]

It's coal-bo time.

 Coal Friending Meme


Yuleporn | Make the Yuletide Gay / TNB+ | Femslash Festivus 
YuleBuilding | Two for One | Crueltide | Misses Clause
YuleSwaps | IF | Wrapping Paper 

Yuletide Discord for Hippos. Google Group for PHs. F_F wiki for history.

yuletide | yuletide_admin | Writing Post
2019 Collection | 2019 Madness
2019 App | Letter Post (LJ) 
 

Flat / Recent | Top-Level (Last) | Search

Comments

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

I ended up only writing four things; three have 'thank you for writing for me' and the one in an 'A' fandom has a few slightly enthused comments. I got a 'thank you for my gift' from not-recip on one. My other one has a kudos and no comments, which I suppose is fair enough since it's AU.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

THREE have "thank you for writing for me" and nothing else from the recip? Literally just those words?

I haven't seen any of those comments in the wild this year, would be interested to see why they've done that.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

You want to gawk at what, exactly?

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

Dc

If three out of four fics they've written have hugely disappointed the recips to the point where they leave an "I'm offended by this but am trying to be polite" comment then maybe ~ just maybe ~ there's an issue with the writer.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

DC My guess is at least a couple are not literally "thank you for writing for me" but one of the shorter comments recips who aren't deep in the Yuletide scene can leave. "Thanks, this is cute!" or whatever.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

And you what, want the author to unanon so you can diagnose it?

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah that's *exactly* what they said. They asked for links to each fic and the author's name and everything. Oh wait, no they didn't at all, so calm down.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

Uh huh, and how do you think they're going to say it's an issue with the writer if they don't have the fics there? Duh.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

Some people do "thank you for writing for me" because they're not plugged into the exchange scene and don't realize it's taken as passive-aggressive. It's not always a slam.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

+1

I'm not an effusive commenter and used that for literal years before I stumbled on this place and found out there were people who were supremely passive-aggressive with their commenting and poisoned the well for everyone.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

NC:

https://archiveofourown.org/collections/yuletide2019/works/21719728
(The Binding, Lucian/Emmett, for yujacheong)

It's not literally "thank you for writing for me" but the recipient's comment is distinctly lukewarm - their comments on past gifts are still short but notably more enthusiastic. I honestly can't see what's wrong with the fic itself, which follows both prompts the recipient left, namely smut and what happens post-canon. I enjoyed it, and at least one other reader left a detailed and enthused comment. So it's probably not what OP wrote, but if you were just interested in underwhelmed recips, here's an example.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

Really obvious too since the recip didn’t kudos the gifts they don’t like, eek, at least make your favouritism less blatant.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

Why? To make things less clear to the authors who did it right?

Encouraging authors that don’t work for you doesn’t really help you. They still commented and didn’t wank in namespace/obviously in anon, they have done everything right and followed coals advice on how to handle a fic you didn’t like.

Lying and false equivalency helps no one.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

It would just feel terrible to be on the receiving end of this, that’s all.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

They were still polite and said something nice about the fic, kind of... Maybe the lack of kudos was accidental.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, sometimes I just forget. I didn't bother kudosing at all if I commented until a big wank on coal 3-4 years ago made me realize that my authors assumed I hated the fic if I didn't kudos it, too. /exaggeration

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

sa

I'm not the recip of the fic in question, to be clear. Just offering my perspective.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

Cyrt

Thanks! You're right, I only skimmed the fic but can't see any obvious problems when compared with the letter. I don't know the fandom though so it's possible it's hugely OOC and I just can't tell!

It's got a bit more to the comment than TFWFM and given that they only use short comments anyway it could be that they were just feeling down when they commented. It's hard to be 100% sure but I certainly wouldn't be thrilled to get this comment. I'm happy for the writer that they got a really great comment underneath though!

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

NC I have the book in my to-read pile and I just flipped through it for voice. I’m not detecting any problems whatsoever? Idk the recipient’s other comments are barely more tepid than this one.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

CYRT - I do know the fandom, and I would have been happy to get this! The characters are IC, the smut is brief but nice, and there are touches of worldbuilding (an item from both the recip's likes and mine.) That's part of why I linked it - it's a well-meant, perfectly good fic with a recip who clearly wasn't feeling it for whatever reason.

I mean, for a much more gracious response to a much worse fic:
https://archiveofourown.org/collections/yuletide2019/works/21810610

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

neither recip had to comment at all. policing who went above and beyond on a subjective thing like fic quality is very CoN.

we have had two wanks this year over technically perfect but not what you want = coal vs technically mediocre/bad but has the soul of everything you love = coal. just because you think one is better than the other doesn’t mean the recips did.

besides they said thanks. take people at their word and move on.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

Yujacheong goes here, just fyi.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

ncyrt

Then a) they already know that a lot of people like longer comments or more enthusiastic so shouldn't be surprised and b) can feel free to say it's a perfectly acceptable comment (which it is!), or whatever else they want to in response

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

You (and they) should know that coals de-facto advice for gifts you dislike is “mention whatever few things you do like, say thank you AND DO NOT FAKE EFFUSIVE PRAISE”.

People like long comments, yes. People want their work to land, yes. I don’t see why you think anycoalie expects a long comment on a fic that didn’t land. The recip isn’t even a long commenter on their fav fics so I don’t get what else you would expect any short commenters lukewarm comments to look like.

/good egg long commenter who genuinely sees nothing wrong with their actions. As an author it would make me feel bad but I’d rather know than treat them again if my best effort fic isn’t their cuppa.

Re: Your Yuletide So Far

[(Anonymous)]

It's still more enthused than the comment the same recip left on this work: https://archiveofourown.org/works/21405121?show_comments=true#comments

My guess in the case you linked is something like "wrong half of ship bottoms" or whatever.