Morbane's coal
In quantum wankchanics, Morbane's coal is a thought experiment, sometimes described as a paradox, of quantum wankerposition. In the thought experiment, a hypothetical gift may be considered simultaneously both the fic of your dreams (TFOYD) and coal, while it is unread state, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur.
The Coaltide interpretation implies that, after a while, the gift is simultaneously TFOYD and coal. Yet, when a coalie clicks on their gift, the coalie sees the gift either TFOYD or coal, not both TFOYD and coal. This poses the question of when exactly quantum wankerposition ends and reality resolves into one possibility or the other.
Madness Opens: Tuesday 26 December
Author Reveals: Monday 1 January
Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespacedrama 18+ discussion. Google Group for PHs.
The Coaltide interpretation implies that, after a while, the gift is simultaneously TFOYD and coal. Yet, when a coalie clicks on their gift, the coalie sees the gift either TFOYD or coal, not both TFOYD and coal. This poses the question of when exactly quantum wankerposition ends and reality resolves into one possibility or the other.
Madness Opens: Tuesday 26 December
Author Reveals: Monday 1 January
Yuletide Discord for Hippos & Exchanges After Dark Discords for Namespace
Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 11:57 am (UTC)(link)I don't think fandom was necessarily smaller (in terms of volume) 15 or 20 years ago. I was just younger and had much more spare time and willingness to compromise. And there was also a lot of... trial and error? I remember I holed myself up for two days and read 100-150 fics and there was usually at least 20 or so that I liked, but that also meant I spent a lot of time reading fic I didn't enjoy. I just don't have the patience and energy for that anymore. (And I agree with the other coalie that tagging is a part of it, as in it helps me make a preselection I couldn't make on the old Yuletide archive.)
Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)In terms of Yuletide though - it was also more... Cohesive? Like in yt 2004 or 2005 I probably knew about half the nominated fandoms and was interested in half the rest; they were all from a similar culture (and the same kinds of fandoms that get rec'd a lot on the yt comm today.) YT is lately probably at least half fandoms that are really not coming out of that general fandom cultural space that still gets all the recs on the DW comm. (This is, let me establish, not a bad thing. Unless you wrote for one and are wondering where all your kudos are.)
Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 04:31 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 04:37 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 05:19 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 05:24 pm (UTC)(link)I'm not sure what that kind of data proves? Especially since AFAIK the numbers are unique, so if a fic gets deleted, the number won't be reused.
Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)I was replying to:
"the largest archives in 2004 had tens of thousands of fic (maybe a couple hundred thousand for Gossamer and FA and ff.net"
FF.net was much bigger than the coalie seemed to think. The data points are that even in 2004, there were millions of fics archived there.
Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 05:29 pm (UTC)(link)Ah, sorry, I misunderstood the point you were making!
Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)It looks like ff.net, at least in the early days, did just count up? But the work number was still significantly higher than the number of works. The only stats on # of works on fanfiction.net I could find were from 2010 (when the site was pretty much at its peak of relevance) and showed that the number of works could be approximated to about 60% of the highest work number. So if you had a work at around 2 mill in 2004, there were probably something less than 1.5 millions works available. Still a lot higher than my estimate! Still about 1/10 of what's currently available just on AO3 (ff.net is currently at about 14 million in work numbers, and Wattpad makes stats even harder to get but it's within the same range as those two.) So I think it's still valid to say that there's something like 10x as much fic available as there was in 2004, and it's much easier to find.
Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)In the days of eGroups / YahooGroups, I didn't have to *find* fic, I got it all emailed right to my inbox. Today, I largely know where to look for it (though people are often posting exclusively to Tumblr/Discord/Patreon, so it's becoming less centralised and harder to find than it was 5-10 years ago), but it involves several more steps than I had to take then.
Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)I can't tell you what Patreon fic is like because I don't have extra money for fandom. Discord fic and Tumblr fic depends highly on the author. There's a lot of crap in the tags, but when my favorite authors take prompts and write fic for them, it's just as good as their AO3 fic.
Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)I learned about fanfic from a Star Trek book and about my first fic mailing list from a friend at summer camp. These days all you have to do to know that fanfic exists is like. Also exist. And then if you want to read some, you can google 'fanfic + character name'. Google is getting worse but at least it's there now.
I won't try to argue that finding good fic is easier, but finding online fic fandom at all definitely is.
Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-02 02:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-02 05:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)Fandom was less public back then and more scattered, yes, with lots of smaller single-fandom and media type archives, but it's not like I had less fic to pick from in 1999 or 2004 and than I have in 2023. Though I suppose that depends on what kind of fandoms you're in.
Like in yt 2004 or 2005 I probably knew about half the nominated fandoms and was interested in half the rest
I think for me, the number of fandoms I knew stayed the same over the years. When I go through the fandom list, I still see lots of movies and books and some theatre and RPF where I have the same initial "oh, I'm familiar with that" reaction. The difference - and this is clearly very subjective - is that in 2004, this reaction was followed by "I'll check the fic out!" whereas now it's usually followed by "... but I don't feel fannish about it" and I scroll further. Mid-2000s me was committed reading everything in an exchange where I vaguely knew the canon. 2023 me doesn't have the time and energy anymore for anything that I don't already have a strong fannish investment in (fandoms, as well as ships and tropes).
Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Losing Yuletide
(Anonymous) 2024-01-01 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)But the biggest fandoms these days routinely get hundreds of works posted a day, and the only thing that came close to that in ~2004 era was *maybe* HP on FA, but I think even then there's more HP fics posted on just AO3 (not even counting Wattpad and fanfiction.net) per day than there was per week on FictionAlley. (I was one of the pre-posting editors for a little while and we definitely weren't getting hundreds a day.)