Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-26 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
It was a treat, and the signup was just a placeholder. I find it odd anybody would write that particular rehash in such a serious "this is devastating" way as a treat for somebody with a placeholder to start with, and odder that the recip rejected it.

The third one only had two requests, and I haven't read it but a glance it's hard to see what was so offensive about it.

It does have a single comment, though, from beatrice_otter. *eyebrows raise*

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-26 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
SA

I've now seen the comments here that it's tagged F/F and ends up M/F.

So with the title "Getting Back to Being a Woman" hanging over that . . . holy fuck.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-26 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Ooof, that title plus the f/f thing is a big yikes.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
So with the title "Getting Back to Being a Woman" hanging over that . . .

WOW. Fuckity nope.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 02:32 am (UTC)(link)
ayrt

Right? I'd still be clutching my motherfucking pearls over that, if I wore pearls. I'm legit angry on the recip's behalf.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-26 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
For the rehash, it could be the treater forgot to put the name on, or the recip accidentally hit reject. It happens.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-26 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, that's why I'm guessing the Home Alone treat writer just forgot to put in the recipient.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-26 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Ha, maybe Beatrice otter is trying to make it clear she did not write this particular unrequested poly.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
Isn't beatrice_otter the one who's ace and won't read/write relationships, while rosefox is the pan+polyvangelist?

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
beatrice_otter is the one who wrote M/F no-homo spitefic with the female half of the M/F pairing running over the other half of the requested M/M pairing with an ambulance for someone who requested M/M.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
No wonder she likes this no-lesbo M/F spitefic, then. *makes hacking sound in throat*

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 04:25 am (UTC)(link)
NC Maybe this is a regional thing but I find lesbo/lezzo really offensive (more offensive than dyke, even). Is that not the case where you're from?

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
If it were, I sure wouldn't have used it.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 04:32 am (UTC)(link)
ok elijah

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 04:34 am (UTC)(link)
Is elijah a lesbian? Cause, honey.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
DC

It's offensive where I am too. I wondered if you were using it ironically, like how some people reclaim slurs, but it still made me wince.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
I don't use homo or lesbo on the regular in everyday conversation, but neither of the no-____ versions offend me. Sorry if it upset anybody, but in context I'll admit I'm surprised about it.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) - 2019-12-27 04:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) - 2019-12-27 04:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) - 2019-12-27 04:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) - 2019-12-27 04:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) - 2019-12-27 05:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
Would anyone mind reminding me how many years ago this was and what the mods did? She still seems to be very much around!

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
It was 2013: http://archiveofourown.org/works/1086024

Not sure if the mods did anything — it was very much a different time for Yuletide.

Classic wank about it, featuring coal defending beatrice-otter:
https://yuletide-coal.dreamwidth.org/8396.html?thread=31250124#cmt31250124

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you!

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
New coalie as of this year wants to thank you for sharing the classic wank! I love the sleuthing.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
It didn't get revealed as a wank until a couple years later. Even if it had come up in 2013, I doubt the mods would have done anything -- it didn't actually violate any DNWs.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
Now I understand the grenade comment last post. Thanks.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2020-01-01 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)
dc

A lot of the support for b_o seems like the work of a troll.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) 2020-01-01 03:37 pm (UTC)(link)
As someone who was there (I was the coalie who said "the point where the Awesome Woman ran over one half of my requested M/M ship with an ambulance is probably the point where I'd assume it was spite fic"), no, I don't think it was just a troll. I think some coalies didn't check out the work, relied on the description, and therefore weren't convinced at first.

...I also think b_o or her friends may have been around.

Re: Early Rejects

(Anonymous) - 2024-02-03 00:15 (UTC) - Expand