Entry tags:
Coal All The Way
It's coal-bo time.
Yuleporn | Make the Yuletide Gay / TNB+ | Femslash Festivus
YuleBuilding | Two for One | Crueltide | Misses Clause
YuleSwaps | IF | Wrapping Paper
Yuletide Discord for Hippos. Google Group for PHs. F_F wiki for history.
Yuleporn | Make the Yuletide Gay / TNB+ | Femslash Festivus
YuleBuilding | Two for One | Crueltide | Misses Clause
YuleSwaps | IF | Wrapping Paper
Yuletide Discord for Hippos. Google Group for PHs. F_F wiki for history.

What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:42 am (UTC)(link)The recip's take: It features a character who, in canon, is a black man who spends his whole life as a servant with the threat of enslavement and/or imprisonment looming over him. At the end of the canon, he becomes a king of his own country and never has to serve anyone ever again.
Except, in this post-canon gift fic, surprise! The citizens of his new country force him to perform menial tasks for them as if he were their servant. This is played for comedy.
vs
The opposing side: Oh, that was really cute. And definitely not at all how OP characterized it. The whole fic seemed to be about Stephen not wanting Childermass to be his servant (and thus very deliberately chore-blocking him), and the fairies were very clearly being positively influenced by Stephen and thrilled to help with the one chore he would actually let them do.
*
Yeah, OP's description of "force him to perform menial tasks for them" is totally inaccurate to the point of wankbaiting. The faeries aren't forcing him to do shit, they're just so inhuman that the only way home comforts like decent, flour-rather-than-bonemeal bread or clean dishes are going to show up is if a human provides them.
The whole point of the fic, in fact, is that Stephen is not allowing anyone else to perform said menial tasks, even when a fellow human shows up and volunteers to serve him.
Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:43 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:47 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 12:57 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:05 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:11 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:13 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:15 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:08 am (UTC)(link)It does get better as the fic progresses, at least, once it's made clear that at least Stephen is deliberately stopping Childermass from doing the chores.
Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:09 am (UTC)(link)So were they right, or were they looking for something to be offended about? I don't know the fandom and don't really want to read the story, but I want to know.
Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:15 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:23 am (UTC)(link)My thoughts exactly.
Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:37 am (UTC)(link)And given that, I'm completely baffled why the recip thought it would be a good idea to mischaracterize the fic instead of just making that case on the merits. Did they think FFA wouldn't try to ferret out which fic it was and check? Their vague-meming wasn't that vague! And if there are two things the BFE thread has an ample supply of, it's spare time and a commitment to wank.
Re: What does coal think of this?
(Anonymous) 2019-12-27 01:51 am (UTC)(link)If the recip had just described it honestly then there probably wouldn't have been pushback. That sure is a badly thought out authorial decision, but it's a "didn't think the implication through" decision rather than an actively racist one.
By exaggerating, the recip undermined their own side. Clearly they didn't think just stating the truth was bad enough so they had to spin it as way more racist than it was.