At the same time, it was suggested to check previous years' examples for possibly-too-broad rpf, if you bother to read the official post about eligibility. Even if you don't look for it, it was also very obviously something that needed evidence post based on the examples given. I am not quite on board with the recent philosophy of narrowing down fandoms as much as possible, to say nothing of some other decisions about dividing and combining, but it's there and in this case it's on the nominator seemingly not even bothering to look at the rules properly.